Sharing under the article
Nishkam: Censoring the message board.
|
|
n0by: Censorship WWW: www.n0by.de Email: Date: May 13, 2003, 0:18 |
|
Dear Nishkam, about Censorship, special in Rajneesh-Rollce-Royce-Rel igion, my fingers get tired to write about. But an article from www.sannyasnews.com is worth to be cut and pasted... otherwise: let the flow, allow the flow, allow the con- and de-struction of Rajneesh-Rollce-Royce-Rel igion, dear Nishkam! Who are we, to interfere with the flow existence? Egos only, who will die - with or without jail. Now my old thoughts - compressed in two lines: CENSORSHIP KILLS COMMUNICATION CONTROVERS Y CREATES COMMUNION For the brave ones, who want to read more: Controversity, Creativity, Connections People, who can't endure controversity, are narrow minded. Narrow mind closes the doors to the mysteries. Closed mind can't connect anymore. To connect creativity needs to endure controversity. Controversity creates intensity. Intensity deepens inner connections. Connections to the inside connect to the outside. Completed connected circles in controversities create credibility. Creditibility attracks people from controvers circle. Controversity dissolves in credibility. The creator of controversity gets credibility. The illusion of balanced peace gets disturbed quite easily by emotional stress in controversities. Controversity-Creators are the engine of evolution. The borders of low mind need to be moved. Moved borders widen narrow prison minded concepts. Controversity breaks the illusion of balanced peace. Truth shouts up inside. Truth is always hidden under cover of illusions. Religions create illusional mind concepts. Illusional mind artists create illusional dream-concepts in political-priestly entertainments. Controversity bridges illusion with reality. Profounder illusions attract blatantly controversities. Result: religious-controversities cut deepest. Illusional mind concepts prepare for real wars. Material controversities follow, when controversial mind concepts failed to balance the quarrels inside - outside. Censorship deepens controversity, 'cos censors brake bridges. 'Cos only controversial minds balance inner-outer tension. Censorship deepens controversity. Censorship kills first the freedom-of-speech. Violent censors burn books. Inflamed mind-quarrels ignite violence. Mad dead end: people kill to dissolve controversities inside outside. Creativity channels and changes controversity: from the material destructive level to the mental constructive level of arts, words, music, films, theater. Censors cut from the material low mind level like jealousy, laziness, convenience the free flow. The free flow creates a constructive level of cultivated controversity. Censors are low level minded and motivated from greed and adaptation to the low level mass mind. Censors disturb the equilibrium for higher level mind controversity creations. The disturbed equilibrium falls down to the material level of controversity. The censors in the material level of controversity manifest as solders, killers, criminals. God-Devil controversity, life-death controversity, hate-love controversity have to be endured by seekers of all path. The art of creation processes controversities. These controversities of high level create tension in low level mind. Low level mass mind asks for protections from controversities. Priest and politics fulfill the low mind longing. Priests and politics protect low mind by censorship. Looks like tamed dogs guard fearful sheep. Low herd instinct. The spiral of more mind protection creates Reply |
|
|
n0by: Censorship, Part 2/2 WWW: www.clickthepig.de/2/gruen/11may03 Email: Date: May 13, 2003, 0:36 |
|
The spiral of more mind protection creates more controversity until the material level. Material level represents the lowest mind level. The creativity of this lowest material mind level represents controversity absolutly to the highest mind level of creation. The absolute contradiction in the lowest mind material level and the artfully artistic mental mind level creates destruction. Material lowest mind destructs artfully artistic mental creations. Example: Taliban destruct the represantion of millennium-creativity: the Buddha Statues. This destruction ends in war. The controversity in spiritual discussions needs to accept even the worst felt manifestations of an artfully artistic mind as helping device. Example http://www.n0by.de/2/rst/ bhagwan.htm When low minded people escape controversity the decline to low mind level has started. Censors abase the low mind level lower and lower. The end: Controversity on material lowest mind level. War unavoidable. n Reply |
|
|
nishkam: RE:Censorship, Part 2/2 Date: May 13, 2003, 13:36 |
|
you did not dissapoint, noby. Your reaction came fast. I read your text very carefully this time. Thank you for your sharing. I think you are really big expert in this area. :-) Reply |
|
|
pradhira: RE:Censorship, Part 2/2 Email: Date: May 13, 2003, 15:47 |
|
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Sounds good, nOby, but... How can you dignify this garbage by calling it 'controversy,' nOby? Controversy requires some level of intelligent inquiry - of intelligent thought. There is no intelligent (or honest) inquiry in these rantings. It's just mud slinging, period. I'm not saying that this crap should be censored. That would be giving it too much importance. But I can't blame anyone for complaining about the stench of it. It is an insult to Osho and to Osho's work. These people are not focusing on their own growth, on their own transformation. Their whole concern is with wallowing in the mud - in the hopes that they can smear some of it on the people in Pune (who are doing Osho's work). It's so revolting! I'm just glad that Osho is not around to see (or smell) it. pradhira Reply |
|
|
n0by: RE:RE:Censorshi p, Part 2/2 WWW: www.n0by.de/2/rst/jaeni.htm Email: Date: May 14, 2003, 12:13 |
|
Dear Pradhira, happy to read you again in cyber-space, our little, lovely world. Your question is very significant, I love it: ''' How can you dignify this garbage by calling it 'controversy,' nOby?''' As matter of fact, dear Pradhira, guess you'll agree in my observation? Otherwise, please complain ;-) ! OK? My observations: every controversial meaning ot mine is bound to come from a lower level of intelligent! With a level of intelligence like mine, people are bound to agree with me! Isn't this true? Unfortunatly these people of deep insights are very rare on earth - so except my woman and the rare last friends - nobody agrees with me. So even my friends like Ka are continously controversial agains my humble opinon! What to do? There are friends for to convert their controversy to this high level of intelligence, that they finally agree with me. Hopefully that will never happen! n Otherwise what was left to argue about? BTW: special for Lotus-Growth mud is inevitable, my dear, isn't it true? Reply |
|
|
n0by: RE:RE:Censorshi p, Part 2/2 WWW: www.n0by.de/2/rst/nishkam.htm Email: Date: May 14, 2003, 12:37 |
|
Dear Nishkam the link above is dedicated to your and your work. You do an excellent job! Full support, love and caring for your work. Even the name of the URL is the essence of sannyas ''rellioussipirit'' - from my point of view. For your security concerning legal threats: Why don't you add just a disclaimer, that everybody is responsible for his contributions? Otherwise: existence has opened with your board (and others like www.sannyasnews.com ) a valve. The repression in sannyas-cirles - even felt in cyber-space - has come below the level of the criminal fascist minded (mostly) women in Rajneeshpuram. For my expertice in this cult area just have a look on my Ma anand Sheela references ;-) www.n0by.de/2/bha/ OSHO0042.HTM n *;-) proudly presented LOL Reply |
|
|
Jukka: RE:Censorship, Part 2/2 WWW: groups.yahoo.com/group/hyperborean_secrets Email: Date: Nov 23, 2003, 20:44 |
|
n0by seems to be absolutely right here. In my group there is no this sort of problems, and it's unmoderated. I feel that if people know that if they say something wrong, they will be moderated, it creates sort of cruelty, and pressure. They will unleash this pressure to those who don't guard their words. It's my belief that spirit of freedom naturally pushes away negative spirits. Then there is no need to interfere. As long as we are dealing with human beings. Spams and webcam offers are other story... Jukka Reply |
|
|
devakrishna: censorship WWW: www.otoons.com Email: Date: May 13, 2003, 7:36 |
|
beloved nishkam, will not remove ur link from my site, it's linked in to many pages and it would be to much work....LOL. i just got tired to hear the same crap over again about CIA and all that. i like the idea of the compost bin altrough. sending u love devakrishna Reply |
|
|
jalal: Compost heap Email: Date: May 13, 2003, 12:48 |
|
Compost heap is a great idea. But maybe easier to do it the other way around, put everything in the compost and then pull out the good, tasty bits. Looking at the Message Board, there seems to be little of any value there. Reply |
|
|
nishkam: RE:Compost heap Date: May 13, 2003, 13:45 |
|
Thank you Jalal. Maybe you are right, so anybody can do this. Delete button is available for everybody now. :-) I would like more to watch the show and reduce my influence to the technical side. By the way I just added the posibility to take some info about people writing on the board. So I think it will help to make the whole atmosphere here more open and friendly. But who knows, as noby wrote 'War unavoidable'. :-) Also thank you for your greeting. Amar is here and she brought it to me. Reply |
|
|
fdf: leave message board as it is Email: Date: May 13, 2003, 16:59 |
|
leave message board as it is and request people not to write true stories, they can be anything. exposing politicians at osho commune is good idea via m. board Reply |
|
|
fdf: RE:leave message board as it is Email: Date: May 13, 2003, 18:38 |
|
sorry, meant to write "request people to write true stories". Instead of the nonsense we are seeing. Reply |
|
|
Nishkam: RE:RE:leave message board as it is Date: May 13, 2003, 19:29 |
|
Dear fdf, the problem is that the message board is not for stories, but for announcements. To write stories there means to misuse the place. I tried to ask and explain, and there is a warning also on the page for adding announcement to the MB. We have another place for stories - this sannyas webzine. It is very simple. But it is another problem with it. So called 'osho rebels' or 'Socrates team' before (I think they are the same people) does not want to sign their messages. They do not want open communication. They want only to publish their press release styled materials. Who is fdf? Why do not write your name? What are you afraid of? This is a problem with the stories. I've got some e-mails with very strong judgements about Pune Resort. I wrote to authors, that if they want the article to be published it has to be published with some information about the author. It is clear for me that the author is fully responsible for an article or a message. But the author is hidden, the rebel who want to judge is afraid to say his/her name. How this relate to Osho or to rebellious spirit? Reply |
|
|
Katha: RE:Censoring the message board. WWW: www.oshorebel.com Email: Date: Aug 19, 2007, 8:06 |
|
Hi Nishkam, start to see the joke... A real Rebel can not do it right for everybody... Trust in Deva Krishna's intelligents... he too faces to be sued by the Resort... the truth will come to the Light... the truth will be seen... trust in your inner voice... and roar as a lion... Love to you Katha. Reply |