Sharing under the article
Jalal: It's time for us to move out into the world and drop the past.
|
|
surednra: jalal Email: Date: Apr 20, 2003, 10:53 |
|
i do not agree with that commune is going well . osho would never wanted this to happen. he wanted place on the earth where there is no politics, no hate, no powertrips. commune has just become place to make money and hurt osho lovers by destroying it Reply |
|
|
phil: RE:jalal Email: Date: Apr 24, 2003, 14:48 |
|
what would osho have done? he would have left.that`s what any one with any sense will do.leave the `commune`(a laughable misnomer by any standards)far behind,physically,mentall y,emotionally and whatever else.even talking about it is flogging a dead horse. maybe it`s hard to accept there`s going to be no ressurection.maybe that`s the challenge. Reply |
|
|
surendra: RE:RE:jalal Email: Date: Apr 26, 2003, 12:31 |
|
hi jalal , i remmber you from 1993, you used tó work with musicians, mixing the sound in budha hall. well do you know what happen to other friend of mine who was there those days working with you. i forgot his name. he was doing same work. mostly during white robes, he had a short beard. you see i am stuck in the past , it is hard to accept for me this suitation at the commune and i can not leave past becasue it was so beautiful and pure and full of osho. thanks a lot for reply love, surendra Reply |
|
|
jalal: Re: the buddhafield Email: Date: Apr 26, 2003, 23:34 |
|
Hi Surendra Replied to you offline about Amano. I'm not sure what you mean by "this situation in the commune" so I cannot comment on whether you are stuck in the past or not. Remember, this piece from me is a response to an email from someone else and needs to be read as such. It is one of a series of messages about the happenings in the Commune (or Resort as it is more correctly known as these days ;) ). love, jalal Reply |
|
|
surednra: RE:Re: the buddhafield Email: Date: Apr 27, 2003, 14:39 |
|
yes it his name was amano, now i remmber thanks surendra Reply |
|
|
Svarup: Amrito's religion Email: Date: May 6, 2003, 11:46 |
|
Svarup’s comment on Jalal’s article: KEERTI is trying to create a RELIGION around Osho? Then what is AMRITO doing? CREATING an anti-Osho-devotional, anti-Osho-remembering RELIGION around his own narrowed insight of Osho's vision. Mind tends to create religions. Amrito is a "spiritual" politician who has no trust in the vast openness of Osho's vision and in the multitude of ways to live and share this vision. Every organized effort to prevent the creation of a religion around Osho will just lead to some other kind of organized "anti"-religion . Amrito is trying to create an iconoclastic kind of religion, anti-devotional and anti-traditional, far more stupid and dictatorial than Keerti's "indian style" religion around Osho. It's not as Jalal suggests that Amrito is focusing on Osho's "message" against Keerti's attempts to create a religion around Osho. In fact, it's just two kinds of religions (traditional / anti-traditional) fighting against each other. Beyond that fight - Osho and His vision ... Love, Svarup Reply |
|
|
karen: RE:It's time for us to move out into the world and drop the Email: Date: Nov 2, 2005, 11:09 |
|
Well said Jalal. Your article has been passed on to likeminded people that wonder how all is evolving now in Poona. I truly feel myself that "creating more buddhafields" is the only way to go. Keep on "cooking" Lo ve, Karen Reply |